1.🧾 PREAMBLE (STATIC + CURRENT AFFAIRS)
Why in News? (2024-25)
- A petition challenged the insertion of the words "Socialist" and "Secular" in the Preamble via the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976.
- The Supreme Court dismissed the petition.
- SC reiterated that the Constitution is a living document and amendments are valid if done via constitutional procedure.
📘 Basics of the Preamble
Element | Details |
---|---|
Adopted on | 26 November 1949 |
Enforced on | 26 January 1950 |
Source of authority | "We, the People of India" |
Constitutional Status in 1950 | Sovereign, Democratic, Republic only (Not Socialist, Not Secular) |
⚖️ Amendment Details
Act | 42nd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1976 |
---|---|
Government | Indira Gandhi Government |
Added Words | Socialist, Secular, Integrity |
Amendability | Yes, Preamble can be amended (but cannot violate Basic Structure) |
🧑⚖️ Important Supreme Court Judgments on Preamble
Case | Verdict |
---|---|
Berubari Union Case (1960) | Preamble is not part of the Constitution |
Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973) | Preamble is part of the Constitution |
LIC of India Case (1995) | Preamble is integral but non-enforceable |
🔑 UPSC Trigger: Match-the-following between cases & judgments.
📚 Key Concepts in the Preamble
1. Justice – 3 Types
- Social
- Economic
- Political
❌ No mention of Legal Justice
2. Liberty – 5 Types
- Thought
- Expression
- Belief
- Faith
- Worship
❌ Economic Liberty not mentioned
✅ Mnemonic:
Thought → Expression → Belief → Faith → Worship
3. Equality
- Of Status
- Of Opportunity
❌ No mention of Social Equity
4. Fraternity
- Ensures Dignity of Individual
- Ensures Unity and Integrity of the Nation
Note:
- Fraternity in Preamble
- Brotherhood in Fundamental Duties
-
Unity & Integrity – mentioned in both Preamble and Fundamental Duties, but with different contexts
- Preamble: Outcome of fraternity
- Duties: Duty to uphold Sovereignty, Unity & Integrity
⚠️ Conceptual Clarifications
Concept | Clarification |
---|---|
Enforceability | Preamble is not legally enforceable independently |
Purpose | It guides interpretation of other constitutional provisions |
Legal Standing | Provisions are enforceable only if reflected elsewhere in Constitution (e.g. Fundamental Rights) |
🧠 UPSC PYQ (2020/21):
"Is Preamble legally enforceable?"
Answer: No, but it can reinforce enforceable provisions elsewhere.
📊 Probable UPSC PT Questions
- Which words were added via the 42nd Amendment?
- Match the SC Cases with their views on the Preamble.
- How many types of liberty are mentioned in the Preamble?
- Is economic liberty mentioned in the Preamble?
- What does fraternity ensure?
- What is the source of authority of the Constitution?
- Can the Preamble be amended?
- Which case established that Preamble is part of the Constitution?
2. Citizenship (2024–2025)
📍Why in News?
- Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), 2019 was implemented in March 2024 through a notification by the Ministry of Home Affairs.
- The implementation comes after a 5-year delay due to protests and COVID-19.
- This makes Citizenship a relevant topic for UPSC Prelims & Mains 2025.
Constitutional Provisions (Articles 5 to 11)
Article | Provision |
---|---|
Article 5 | Citizenship at the commencement of the Constitution (26 Jan 1950). |
Article 6 | Citizenship for migrants from Pakistan. |
Article 7 | Citizenship rights of migrants to Pakistan (during Partition). |
Article 8 | Citizenship for Indians living abroad. |
Article 9 | No citizenship if a person voluntarily acquires foreign citizenship. |
Article 10 | Continuance of citizenship rights under Parliament’s laws. |
Article 11 | Parliament has the power to make laws on citizenship. |
📝 Note: These provisions were only applicable at the time of independence. Future rules are decided by Parliament through legislation.
🔹 Citizenship Act, 1955
Based on Article 11, Citizenship Act, 1955 was enacted.
🔹 5 Ways to Acquire Indian Citizenship under the Act
- By Birth
- By Descent
- By Registration
- By Naturalization
- By Incorporation of Territory
🔹 Assam Accord (1985) – Section 6A of Citizenship Act
- Due to illegal migration from Bangladesh to Assam.
-
As per Section 6A:
- Migrants detected as foreigners will be given citizenship after staying 10 years in India from the date of detection.
- Applies only to those from East Pakistan (Bangladesh) before 25 March 1971.
✅ Assam Accord was added to the Citizenship Act through an amendment.
🔹 Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), 2019
Purpose: To provide protection to persecuted religious minorities from Islamic countries.
🟩 Key Provisions:
-
Applies to migrants from:
- Afghanistan
- Bangladesh
- Pakistan
-
Eligible Religious Communities:
- Hindus
- Sikhs
- Buddhists
- Jains
- Parsis
- Christians
-
Cut-off Date:
- Migrants who came to India before 31 Dec 2014.
- These persons will NOT be treated as illegal migrants.
-
Relaxed Naturalization Period:
- Reduced from 11 years to 5 years for these migrants.
-
Not Applicable in:
- Sixth Schedule areas (tribal areas of Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Tripura).
- Areas under Inner Line Permit (ILP) system.
🔹 Citizenship Amendment – Type of Majority Required?
-
To amend Citizenship Act (like CAA 2019), only a Simple Majority in Parliament is needed.
- ✅ NOT a Constitutional Amendment, so Special Majority not required.
🔍 UPSC Focus: What to Study?
- Articles 5–11 (Just basics)
- Citizenship Act, 1955 – only acquisition methods + recent amendments
- Assam Accord – just Section 6A
-
CAA 2019 – only:
- 3 countries
- 6 religions
- Cut-off date: 31 Dec 2014
- 5-year naturalization
- Areas of non-applicability
- Type of majority: Simple Majority
❌ What Not to Focus On?
- Don't memories tables from Laxmikanth.
- No need to study the exact dates/sections in detail.
- UPSC mostly asks fundamental conceptual questions, not deep legal technicalities.
3. Foreigners Tribunal (2024–2025)
📍Why in News?
- Foreigners Tribunals (FTs) have been in focus due to ongoing concerns over illegal immigration in Assam and implementation of CAA 2019.
- The role of FTs is important in determining the citizenship status of individuals under Foreigners Act, 1946.
🧾 What is a Foreigners Tribunal (FT)?
Aspect |
Details |
Type of Body |
Quasi-judicial body (Not a constitutional body) |
Established Under |
Foreigners (Tribunal) Order, 1964 – under Foreigners Act, 1946 |
Authority |
Can declare whether a person is a foreigner or not (i.e., not a citizen of India) |
Jurisdiction |
Primarily in Assam; can be set up elsewhere if needed |
Legal Status |
Has powers of a civil court (e.g., summoning, evidence collection, etc.) |
⚖️ Powers of Foreigners Tribunal
- Quasi-judicial authority (not a regular court)
- Power to summon witnesses and documents
- Decides if a person is an illegal foreigner
- Orders passed are binding unless overturned by a High Court or Supreme Court
👥 Who Can Approach the FT?
- Referral by the Police – if suspected to be an illegal migrant.
- NRC Authority (in Assam) – post-verification.
- Self-declaration – a person can approach FT to prove Indian citizenship.
🧠 Prelims Focus Points
Feature |
Detail |
FT is a Constitutional Body? |
❌ No, it’s a quasi-judicial body |
Power similar to? |
Civil Court |
Established under? |
Foreigners Act, 1946 + Tribunal Order, 1964 |
Who declares someone a foreigner? |
Only the Foreigners Tribunal, not police or govt |
In which state is it most active? |
Assam |
📝 Mains Relevance (GS Paper 2 – Governance)
Q: Examine the role of Foreigners Tribunals in India. How do they balance national security with individual rights?
➡️ Include:
- Role in detecting illegal immigrants
- Concerns about due process, fundamental rights, and arbitrary procedures
- Need for reforms and legal safeguards
- Relevance with NRC & CAA implementation
📌 UPSC Notes Summary
Topic |
Key Points |
Body Type |
Quasi-judicial |
Powers |
Equivalent to Civil Court |
Purpose |
Declare a person as foreigner (illegal immigrant) |
Act |
Foreigners Act, 1946 |
Controversy |
Delay in decisions, human rights concerns, lack of legal aid |
4. Indian Passport Rules & Provisions (2024–2025)
📍Why in News?
- The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) made key amendments to rules regarding the Date of Birth (DOB) proof for passport issuance, especially for children born in or after 2023.
✳️ Key Change – Sole Proof of DOB for Passport (From 2023 Onwards)
Feature |
Description |
New Rule |
For applicants born on or after 1st January 2023, only a Birth Certificate will be accepted as proof of Date of Birth for passport issuance. |
Applicable Under |
Passport Rules, 1980 (amended) |
Issued By |
Birth certificate must be issued by the local civil authority as per the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. |
🔖 Earlier Provision (Before Amendment):
- Applicants could submit any one of multiple documents as proof of DOB, such as:
- PAN card
- Aadhaar
- Matriculation certificate
- Voter ID
- Driving license
- Birth certificate
🔁 Now Changed To (For post-2023 births):
- Only Birth Certificate accepted. No alternatives.
🧠 UPSC Prelims Bits
Topic |
Detail |
Date of Implementation |
Applicable to those born on or after 1st January 2023 |
Sole Document for DOB |
✅ Birth Certificate |
Legal Backing |
Passport Act, 1967 + Rules framed under it |
Issued by |
Civil Registration Authorities under Births & Deaths Act, 1969 |
🗂️ Types of Indian Passports
There are three categories of Indian passports:
Type |
Purpose |
Color |
Ordinary Passport |
General public for travel |
Navy Blue |
Diplomatic Passport |
Indian diplomats, top officials |
Maroon |
Official Passport |
Government officials on duty |
White |
📌 No need to memorize all – Just be aware of classification.
🏛️ Constitutional Aspect – Union List Entry
Question |
Answer |
"Passport and Visa" come under which list? |
✅ Union List |
Not under |
❌ Concurrent List or State List |
Under Entry |
Entry 19 of the Union List, Seventh Schedule, Constitution of India |
🧾 Relevant Legal Framework
Law |
Description |
Passport Act, 1967 |
Governs the issuance of Indian passports and travel documents |
Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969 |
Governs the issuance of birth certificates |
Indian Constitution (Seventh Schedule) |
Places Passport, Visa, Immigration, Emigration under Union List (Entry 19) |
📝 Mains Relevance (GS Paper 2 – Governance)
Q: Examine the implications of making Birth Certificate the sole document for DOB proof in passport issuance.
➡️ Talking Points:
- Standardization of identity verification
- Reduction in fraudulent documents
- Challenges in rural areas with unregistered births
- Need for digitized and accessible birth registration systems
- Linkage with National Population Register and CAA concerns (if any)
📌 UPSC Notes Summary
Topic |
Key Facts |
Only accepted DOB proof (post-2023) |
Birth Certificate |
Applicable from |
1st January 2023 |
No longer accepted |
Aadhaar, PAN, Matric certificate etc. (for post-2023 births) |
Passport – Union/State/Concurrent List? |
Union List (Entry 19) |
Types of Passport |
Ordinary, Diplomatic, Official |
5. Enemy Property in India
📍Why in News?
- The topic of Enemy Property has been in discussion due to government actions on confiscation, monetization, and policy clarity regarding these properties.
- Recently, the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) undertook steps to auction or manage enemy properties lying vacant in India.
🧾 What is Enemy Property?
Term |
Explanation |
Enemy Property |
Refers to the property left behind in India by people who took citizenship of enemy countries during or after wars/conflicts with India. |
Enemy Alien |
A citizen of a country that is at war with or hostile to India. If such a person owns immovable property in India, it is declared Enemy Property. |
Applicable Countries |
Primarily: 🇵🇰 Pakistan and 🇨🇳 China (after 1947, 1962, and 1965 wars). |
🧠 Conceptual Understanding
🧍 Types of Persons:
- Citizen: Indian national.
- Alien: Foreign national.
- Friendly Alien: Citizen of a country with peaceful relations.
- Enemy Alien: Citizen of a country currently or previously at war with India (e.g., Pakistan, China).
🔐 Enemy Property:
- If an Enemy Alien held movable or immovable property in India (land, houses, jewelry, etc.), it is classified as Enemy Property.
- This property is vested in the Custodian of Enemy Property for India, under the Home Ministry.
⚖️ Legal Framework
Law |
Description |
Enemy Property Act, 1968 |
Enacted after the Indo-Pak wars of 1965, to regulate and vest the properties left behind by those who migrated to Pakistan or China. |
Amendments in 2017 |
Major amendment made the Custodian the absolute owner; stripped successors or legal heirs of the right to claim enemy property. |
🔄 Key Provisions of Enemy Property (Amendment) Act, 2017
- Custodian has absolute rights over Enemy Property.
- Heirs, successors, or transferees of enemy nationals cannot claim such property.
- Transfer of such property is void—retrospectively from 1968.
- Applicable even if:
- The enemy national has died.
- The legal heir is an Indian citizen.
- Property was acquired through sale, gift, or lease.
🏢 Administering Authority
Feature |
Details |
Custodian of Enemy Property |
Appointed by the Government of India under the Home Ministry. |
Works under |
Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) |
Key Role |
Identification, management, monetization, and disposal of Enemy Property. |
📊 Key Statistics (as of latest data)
Parameter |
Value |
🏘️ Total Immovable Enemy Properties |
Around 9,400+ |
🇵🇰 Pakistani Enemy Properties |
~9,200+ |
🇨🇳 Chinese Enemy Properties |
~150+ |
💰 Estimated Value |
Over ₹1 lakh crore (as per MHA estimates) |
🗳️ Constitutional Relevance
Topic |
Detail |
Entry in Constitution |
Part of Union List (Entry 41): "Inter-State migration; Inter-State quarantine" & Entry 18 (Transfer of property) indirectly applicable |
Central Subject |
Property & its vesting in Custodian is under Central Government’s domain |
Legal Jurisdiction |
Not a matter of dispute in civil courts due to sovereign vesting in Custodian |
🧾 Landmark Judgments
- Union of India vs Raja Mohammed Amir Mohammad Khan (2005):
- SC upheld the validity of the Custodian's authority and the principle that enemy property cannot be claimed by legal heirs.
📝 UPSC Mains Relevance (GS Paper 2 – Governance, GS Paper 3 – Internal Security)
Q: Discuss the implications of the Enemy Property Act, 1968, and its recent amendments on property rights and national security.
➡️ Points to Cover:
- Sovereignty and property nationalization in post-war context
- Impact on property rights and inheritance laws
- Strategic importance of enemy assets
- Administrative challenges in identification and monetization
- Debate over fairness when legal heirs are Indian citizens
📌 UPSC Notes Summary
Topic |
Detail |
Enemy Property |
Property owned by citizens of enemy countries (mainly Pakistan, China) during war periods |
Declared Under |
Enemy Property Act, 1968 |
Administered By |
Custodian under Ministry of Home Affairs |
Amendment Act (2017) |
Bars legal heirs from claiming such property |
Total Properties |
~9,400+ (mostly from Pakistan) |
Heirs’ Rights |
❌ No rights, even if Indian citizen |
Transferability |
❌ Not allowed – void ab initio |
Union or State Subject? |
✅ Union List matter |
6. Formation of New States in India
Context: 10 years of Telangana’s formation (2014–2024)
📌 BACKGROUND: Telangana Formation
- Telangana became the 29th state of India on 2 June 2014 after being carved out of Andhra Pradesh.
- This marks 10 years of its formation in 2024.
- The demand was rooted in linguistic, cultural, economic, and administrative aspirations of the region.
⚖️ Constitutional Provisions for Formation & Reorganization of States
Article |
Provision |
Article 1 |
"India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States." – defines India’s political structure. |
Article 2 |
Empowers Parliament to admit or establish new states from outside India (e.g., through treaty or war). |
Article 3 |
Governs formation of new states, or alteration of boundaries, areas, or names of existing states. |
Article 4 |
Clarifies that changes under Articles 2 & 3 are not considered constitutional amendments, and can be made by simple majority in Parliament. |
🧠 Conceptual Clarity – Article 2 vs Article 3
Feature |
Article 2 |
Article 3 |
Purpose |
Admission or establishment of a new state from outside India |
Creation of new state from existing Indian territory |
Example |
Hypothetically, annexing part of Bangladesh, Sri Lanka |
Telangana (from Andhra), Jharkhand (from Bihar) |
Who makes the law? |
Parliament |
Parliament |
Need President’s Recommendation? |
Yes |
Yes (prior to introduction of bill) |
State Legislature’s Consent? |
Not needed |
View must be sought, but not binding |
Amendment under Article 368? |
❌ No |
❌ No |
Simple Majority sufficient? |
✅ Yes |
✅ Yes |
🔄 Procedure for Creating a New State (Article 3 Flowchart)
- Presidential Recommendation (Mandatory)
- Bill cannot be introduced in Parliament without President’s prior recommendation.
- President Refers the Bill to Concerned State Legislature
- The concerned state (whose boundary/name/area is being changed) must be informed and consulted.
- State can express its views within a specified time.
- ⚠️ State's opinion is not binding.
- Introduction of Bill in Parliament
- Can be introduced in either House.
- Passage in Parliament
- Bill must be passed by simple majority in both Houses (Lok Sabha + Rajya Sabha).
- NOT a constitutional amendment → No Article 368 involved.
- President’s Assent
- Once both Houses pass the bill, it is sent for President’s assent, after which the new state is created.
🗺️ Real-life Examples under Article 3
New State |
From Which State |
Year of Creation |
Telangana |
Andhra Pradesh |
2014 |
Uttarakhand |
Uttar Pradesh |
2000 |
Jharkhand |
Bihar |
2000 |
Chhattisgarh |
Madhya Pradesh |
2000 |
Haryana |
Punjab |
1966 |
🗂️ Role of Schedules (1 & 4) – Article 4 Link
When changes are made under Article 2 or 3:
- Schedule I (List of States and Union Territories):
- Needs to be updated to reflect the new state or altered names.
- Schedule IV (Rajya Sabha Seat Allocation):
- Must be updated to adjust representation in Rajya Sabha for newly created or reorganized states.
✨ Important:
- Changes to Schedules I & IV are considered part of the original legislation and not constitutional amendments.
🧾 Special Case: Ceding Territory to Another Country
- If India wants to cede territory to a foreign country (e.g., India-Bangladesh Land Boundary Agreement), it requires constitutional amendment under Article 368.
- Example:
- 119th Constitutional Amendment Bill and 100th Constitutional Amendment Act (2015) – ratified the India-Bangladesh land boundary agreement.
🧭 New District Creation – Not a Parliamentary Matter
Feature |
Detail |
Who handles it? |
State Government (executive action or state law) |
Parliament’s role? |
❌ None |
Example |
Creation of new districts like Palghar (MH), Bhiwani (HR), etc. done by states. |
Legal Instrument |
Executive Order / State Legislative Act |
🎯 UPSC Mains Angle – GS Paper II (Polity & Governance)
Sample Question:
Discuss the constitutional mechanism for the creation of new states in India. How has this mechanism been used in the recent past? Highlight its significance in federal governance.
✅ Use Telangana (2014), Andhra Reorganization Act, and Article 3–4 procedural steps in your answer.
🧠 UPSC Prelims Key Points Recap:
Topic |
Fact |
Telangana Formation Year |
2014 |
Article for Creating New State |
Article 3 |
Article for Adding Foreign State |
Article 2 |
President’s Recommendation Required? |
✅ Yes |
State Legislature’s Consent Binding? |
❌ No |
Type of Majority in Parliament |
Simple Majority |
Constitutional Amendment Needed? |
❌ No |
Schedules Involved |
Schedule I (States), Schedule IV (Rajya Sabha Seats) |
